When reading the
article Encouraging ESL Students To Read,
one thing caught my attention: "[Children's books] are not acceptable and
are therefore rejected because of social pressures" (CN 2.5). I wonder,
when reading this, to what extent they consider children's books to be in fact
for children. This question has been brought-up before by my Children's
Literature teacher and to this she explains that children's literature can be
everything it should be: beautiful, dreamy, adequate for most audiences, and
more than anything, easy to attach to. Shouldn't literature of the such be seen
as a wise choice for readers? Especially those who haven't had much reading
experience? I believe that it should. The best way to get someone to appreciate
literature is — as mentioned in the text — ensuring that their first experience
is good experience for them, therefore allowing them to read something they can
relate to and to stay interested.
Another aspect that
was of interest to me was that of the second suggestion: "[...] ask ESL
students to record on audiotape easy books for younger students in the
school". I believe this is an interesting type of technique to get the
students involved and make sure they feel as if their reading is very important
for others' comprehension. Making students feel useful is a key to success in
most levels of education however, making other students benefit from the
others' learning is even more of a triumph over trying to get them to
understand "why" they must do such a task as reading.

No comments:
Post a Comment